Honestly I have no clue what will happen next.These will often include the application, an arrow, and a shortcut for the Applications folder. Your just another list amoung others with also valid reasons… If your not investing with money or the time to improve it. Even though it would be big with it.īut the attitude presented in this thread is useless as a rock for how much I may agree with the ideas. it just needs to be tackled a bit different or have a derivative engine to be different a bit.įor animation I think there is bigger needs still than vector. I always thought PS and AI should have been the same program and Krita does that merge and it is amazing and it has the Calligraphy tool already. Vector having a more prevelant space would solve bunch of problems in a simple and efficient way after and allow growth.Īlso vector in Krita is better than in inkscape for me already. Users are just ussually oblivious of its existence. CSP and other Animation uses it hiden from users and ignoring it not a good move. This to say vector is a path to another world, and for now illustration and animation would greatly be increased by it because. Making more rival applications than PS and CSP. There will come a time where just illustration for artists will be a section and there will be people doing other stuff with it. Just asking for every option you want straight away will take years and years for any company let alone open source.ĭespite the objectives of Krita this is a tool with so much potential I feel most people don’t see because how it is presented to people. I did a vector brush engine feature request that was the essencial tools for the rest to come after. That is why the vector thing should start small but be able to grow health from that point on by knowing what will come ahead. The closest to Krita is CSP and if Krita can get to how csp handles their text and objects I think by that point it will be more than adequate. Īnd Krita has other things they focusing right now that helps in its core functionality of what it is as a software. Like grease pencil alone TOOOOK long time and a couple of rewrites before it came to what it is today. Its like asking inkscape to paint like krita does. Can it COMPETE with fully DEDICATED vector app at this moment… not yet. does the vector need more work to be more functional and be more useful for illustration that can use it - 100% ofcourse. Same way with Vector, can krita do vector - yes. Like the way people are wanting to make it photo editor - it can, is it efficient - maybe, can it compete to apps thats fully dedicated to that, does it miss feature of those app dedicated to that - well yes. Its like faulting Krita on a function that is not fully its main purpose. I agree that vector has a room in it, im on camp of improving vector but that is to improve vector to help illustration that Krita does well - like webtoons or manga/comics and text is use more than vector only - but like I said before. Its a Digital painting app and is competitive digital painting app.
#BOXY SVG EDITOR MASK FULL#
Why are we wanting krita to compete with full vector software.
0 kommentar(er)
